Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3413 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 149 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €299.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |