Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon E5-1660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2039 days newer than Xeon E5-1660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-1660 - 407 vs 377 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
407
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €120.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
601
48.27309236947791%
Multi-Core
2985
87.66519823788546%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |