Buy on Amazon
€285.98
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1113
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1113
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $513
Availability
MSRP in USD: $513
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1730 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 242 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $198.89 vs $257.64
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Xeon E5-1660 V4 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3OEM Pack
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 288 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i9-11900KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for €220.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i9-11900KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1173
50.625809236081146%
Multi-Core
6726
66.42962962962963%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.