Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 749 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 256 vs 255 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $43.14 vs $257.64
- Up to 83% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $0.19 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 88 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10306 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
256
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 88 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |