Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 835 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 14% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 166 vs 146 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $164.59 vs $257.64
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Buy for €182.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1173
92.07221350078493%
Multi-Core
6726
90.2334317145157%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |