Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 651 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 150 vs 148 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |