Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1037 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $59.8 vs $264.69
- Up to 76% better value when playing New World than Core i9-9900 - $0.6 vs $2.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 8% better in New World than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
110
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Buy for €293.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |