Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $57.05 vs $197.42
- Up to 69% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-11900 - $0.31 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 9% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 221 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
203
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3587 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
31%
Price, €
€219.14
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |