Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 195 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $304.01 vs $1041.95
- Up to 74% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $1.73 vs $6.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
171
87.6923076923077%
Value, €/FPS
€6.76/FPS
25.591715976331365%
Price, €
€1156.56
29%
Buy for €1,156.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1618 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€337.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €337.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
69.24882629107981%
Multi-Core
5480
65.07540672129201%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |