Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 324 days older than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $59.8 vs $131.61
- Up to 53% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-6700K - $0.22 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 312 vs 307 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 91 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
307
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |