Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1513 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 182 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $57.05 vs $89.23
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - $0.35 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15378 minutes ago
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15377 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |