Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 197 days older than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-7400T - 228 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 8% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $54.84 vs $59.8
- Up to 7% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.27 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
93%
Price, €
€66.38
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
223
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |