Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $57.05 vs $102.37
- Up to 43% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-11600 - $0.29 vs $0.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 224 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
215
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
56%
Price, €
€113.63
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |