Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1295 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 23% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G1620 - 135 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - $33.59 vs $35.83
- Up to 22% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Celeron G1620 - $0.28 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €37.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
81.48148148148148%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
77.77777777777779%
Price, €
€39.77
93%
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.66101694915254%
Multi-Core
723
13.193430656934307%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |