Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $59.8 vs $400.11
- Up to 82% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.56 vs $3.2 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 139 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
119
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.2/FPS
17%
Price, €
€444.12
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €444.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |