Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 2399 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - $59.8 vs $269.8
- Up to 76% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 9 7900 - $0.31 vs $1.28 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 234 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
215
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Buy for €299.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |