Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1112 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $59.8 vs $61.42
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 124 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.55 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.18
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |