Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1336 days newer than the more expensive FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-4300 - 479 vs 450 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-4300 - $33.59 vs $35.11
- Up to 11% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than FX-4300 - $0.08 vs $0.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
479
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €37.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
450
93.94572025052193%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
88.8888888888889%
Price, €
€38.97
95%
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |