Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v3 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v3 is 358 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
- Performs up to 10% better in Minecraft than Celeron G3900 - 677 vs 614 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
614
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |