Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1037 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 169 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€221.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €221.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |