Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2604 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-1620 - 271 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€226.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |