Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1620 - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€171.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €171.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
600
35.39823008849557%
Multi-Core
2238
26.33560837844199%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |