Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3325 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 22% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-1620 - 153 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |