Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 851 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $169.73 vs $281.51
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 207 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77113 minutes ago
Buy for €312.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
65.22781774580336%
Multi-Core
3898
48.969849246231156%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |