Buy on Amazon
€110.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $99.89 vs $195.74
- Up to 45% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900 - $0.62 vs $1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 193 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
180
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
54%
Price, €
€217.27
51%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €217.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.