Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4790 is 781 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 170 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $84.08 vs $169.73
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77621 minutes ago
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |