Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 2675 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $169.73 vs $254.44
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 119% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 349 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Diablo IV than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.81 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 28 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
159
45.55873925501432%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
68.64406779661017%
Price, €
€188.4
100%
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43958 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
349
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€282.43
66%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €282.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43955 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
36.57142857142857%
Multi-Core
3898
20.266195279193095%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |