Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 2045 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $99.89 vs $194.13
- Up to 16% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-12700 - $0.8 vs $0.95 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 65% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 228 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
138
60%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
84%
Price, €
€215.48
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |