Buy on Amazon
€110.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $99.89 vs $160.86
- Up to 34% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-11700F - $0.44 vs $0.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 267 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
254
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
65%
Price, €
€178.55
62%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €178.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.