Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 472 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 5% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 701 vs 669 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $93.73 vs $99.89
- Up to 12% better value when playing Minecraft than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.15 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
701
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €104.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |