Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1114 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4570S - 126 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570S
- Up to 6% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $93.56 vs $99.89
- Up to 6% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.83 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
94%
Price, €
€110.88
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
125
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €103.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570S |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |