Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2675 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $99.89 vs $214.96
- Up to 49% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-14600KF - $0.21 vs $0.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 584 vs 523 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
523
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
584
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
51%
Price, €
€238.61
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €238.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |