Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1037 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 237 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $87.75 vs $99.89
- Up to 15% better value when playing Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.41 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |