Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1485 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $169.73 vs $676.35
- Up to 68% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.59 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 140 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 25% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 402 vs 321 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
321
79.8507462686567%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56249 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
402
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
31.550802139037433%
Price, €
€750.75
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €750.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
64.9164677804296%
Multi-Core
3898
31.55508783291508%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |