Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1599 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $169.73 vs $269.8
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 53% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 155 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76982 minutes ago
Buy for €299.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
49.703060758337145%
Multi-Core
3898
32.05855744715848%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |