Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 668 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 102 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $131.61 vs $169.73
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77573 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77573 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
97.66606822262118%
Multi-Core
3898
71.01475678629987%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |