Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 2290 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $99.89 vs $146.23
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 133% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 98 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 37% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.66 vs $2.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.31
68%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €162.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |