Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 668 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 175 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $65.44 vs $169.73
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77592 minutes ago
Buy for €72.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
87.95472918350849%
Multi-Core
3898
74.06422192665781%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |