Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 1758 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 27% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 407 vs 321 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $62.14 vs $169.73
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77500 minutes ago
Buy for €68.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77499 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
63.366336633663366%
Multi-Core
3898
71.10543597227289%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |