Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1148 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 14% better in Dota 2 than FX-6350 - 191 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 60% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $40.22 vs $99.89
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dota 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.27 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
46%
Price, €
€110.88
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |