Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 808 days older than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than Athlon 200GE - 191 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 70% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $51.17 vs $169.73
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dota 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.31 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
31.313131313131315%
Price, €
€188.4
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16833 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
183
95.81151832460732%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
81.70955882352942%
Multi-Core
1857
47.639815289892255%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |