Buy on Amazon
€323.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $429
Availability
MSRP in USD: $429
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 159 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€323.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 12-Core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €323.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.