Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 2781 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 266 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €105.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |