Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 1053 days older than Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10306 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |