Buy on Amazon
€33.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 233 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 171 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.