Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1319 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 4% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 324 vs 312 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
324
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |