Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 946 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1607 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1607 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1023
91.0952804986643%
Multi-Core
3157
66.24003357112883%
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
