Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2438 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 191 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€381.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €381.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |