Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1575M v5 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1575M v5 is 1188 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6300 - 173 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
87.28323699421965%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |