Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E3-1545M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2438 days newer than Xeon E3-1545M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 18% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1545M v5 - 152 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €178.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |